How to listen for property changes in an @Observable class using AsyncStreams

Sponsored
RevenueCat logo
Develop with RocketSim, Ship with Helm.

Helm Pro yearly subscribers now get a 30% discount on RocketSim thanks to contingent pricing on the App Store.

Before the introduction of @Observable in WWDC23, the only way to make a class’ property observable to SwiftUI was to use the @Published property wrapper and make the class conform to the ObservableObject protocol.

This approach would allow you to observe the class in SwiftUI using the @ObservedObject or StateObject property wrappers and any @Published property would cause the view to update when it changed. Futhermore, all @Published properties could be converted to Bindings by using the $ prefix, much like a @State property.

Let’s take this simple SwiftUI view with a single text and text field as an example. As the user types in the text field, the contents of the Text get updated:

Let’s implement the logic for this view using a ViewModel that conforms to ObservableObject and has a @Published property:

ViewModel.swift
import Foundation

class ViewModel: ObservableObject {
    @Published var text = ""
}

And let’s now use this ViewModel in the view:

ContentView.swift
import SwiftUI

struct ContentView: View {
    @StateObject var viewModel = ViewModel()
    
    var body: some View {
        VStack {
            Text(viewModel.text)
            TextField("Type something", text: $viewModel.text)
                .textFieldStyle(.roundedBorder)
        }
        .padding()
    }
}

Let’s now see how you can achieve the same result using the new @Observable macro in the ViewModel:

ViewModel.swift
import Foundation

@Observable class ViewModel {
    var text = ""
}

And then update the SwiftUI view to use the @Observable ViewModel:

ContentView.swift
import SwiftUI

struct ContentView: View {
    @State var viewModel = ViewModel()
    
    var body: some View {
        VStack {
            Text(viewModel.text)
            TextField("Type something", text: $viewModel.text)
                .textFieldStyle(.roundedBorder)
        }
        .padding()
    }
}

As you can see, the migration is pretty straightforward. The main differences betweent the two approaches are:

  1. You don’t need to conform to ObservableObject anymore, you decorate the class with the @Observable macro instead.
  2. You don’t need to use the @Published property wrapper anymore, you just declare the property as a regular property. By default, all properties in the class will be observed, but you can also specify which properties you want to observe by using the @ObservationIgnored macro on the property itself.
  3. You don’t need to use the @StateObject property wrapper anymore, you just use the normal @State property wrapper instead.

Observing property changes

Let’s now consider that you want to perform an action every time the text property changes or, in other words, when the user types in the text field. This is exactly how search works in most apps: as you type, a network request is fired and the results are updated in the UI.

Using ObservableObject

Side effects are incredibly simple to achieve when using the ObservableObject protocol and @Published properties. As the @Published property wrapper uses Combine under the hood, you can access its underlying publisher using the $ prefix and then use the sink method to listen for changes:

ViewModel.swift
import Foundation
import Combine

class ViewModel: ObservableObject {
    @Published var text = ""
    
    private var cancellable: AnyCancellable?
    
    init() {
        cancellable = $text
            .sink { text in
                print("✅ Text changed to: \(text)")
            }
    }
    
    deinit {
        cancellable?.cancel()
    }
}

The benefit this approach has is that you can easily cancel the subscription at any time by calling cancel on the AnyCancellable instance and that you can leverage the full power of Combine to perform complex operations.

For example, when the user types in the text field, you could debounce the text changes and only perform the search when the input is not emtpy, filter out duplicate searches and after the user has stopped typing for a certain amount of time:

ViewModel.swift
cancellable = $text
    .filter { !$0.isEmpty }
    .removeDuplicates()
    .debounce(for: 0.5, scheduler: DispatchQueue.global(qos: .userInitiated))
    .sink { text in
        print("✅ Text changed to: \(text)")
    }

Using AsyncStreams

Reacting to property changes is fairly straightforward using the @Observable macro as well. You can simply use the willSet or didSet property observers to listen for changes:

ViewModel.swift
import Foundation

@Observable class ViewModel {
    var text = "" {
        willSet {
            print("✅ Text changed to: \(text)")
        }
    }
}

Unfortunately, when performing the same complex operations as we did with Combine, the willSet and didSet property observers are not enough. This is where AsyncStreams come into play.

You can create a new AsyncStream instance and use the yield method to publish new changes:

ViewModel.swift
import Foundation

@Observable final class ViewModel {
    private let (textStream, continuation) = AsyncStream.makeStream(of: String.self)
    var text = "" {
        willSet {
            continuation.yield(newValue)
        }
    }
    
    init() {
        Task {
            for await text in textStream {
                print("✅ Text changed to: \(text)")
            }
        }
    }
    
    deinit {
        continuation.finish()
    }
} 

To perform the same complex operations as we did with Combine, you can use Apple’s swift-async-algorithms Swift Package and leverage the vast amount of operators it provides:

ViewModel.swift
import Foundation
import AsyncAlgorithms

@Observable final class ViewModel {
    // ...

    init() {
        Task {
            for await text in textStream
                .filter({ !$0.isEmpty })
                .removeDuplicates()
                .debounce(for: .seconds(0.5)) {
                print("✅ Text changed to: \(text)")
            }
        }
    }

    // ...
}

It is true that you can achieve the same result by creating a Combine publisher instead of an AsyncStream and use the sink method to listen for changes. However, AsyncStreams seem to be a more natural fit with async/await and a more future-proof solution given the direction Swift is heading towards.